The new issue of Memory Insufficient is out now! My friend Cameron Kunzelman had these kind words to say about it:
"...media studies has a bad habit to wait for history to become history before it works to make it more clear. Memory Insufficient is making a real political intervention in this reifying effect, and I wish we could see more of these smaller edited collections pop up."
Last month I gave a talk at the Queerness and Games Conference. I took it as a chance to reflect on the relationship between queerness and hegemony when writing histories that include marginalised perspectives. To build histories that challenge authority rather than creating it, I think we have to dismantle not just great men, but also the idea that there is a main stream of history to which some stories just don’t belong. People seemed pretty excited by it, but I think there’s a lot of work still to do developing the points I wanted to make, so I’m hoping there will be an opportunity to publish something on this topic in the future. Nonetheless, if you’re keen on seeing where I’m up to so far on this you can read the text of the talk on Medium.
Memory Insufficient is part of that attempt to change the way that I do history, to accommodate the fluidity and fragmentation of human experience. The latest issue, on disabilities in games history, has done very well and has been shared with about 1,500 people. Even though it’s short, the content there is very powerful, challenging us to think about representation not just in terms of ‘is this depiction sympathetic’ but also in terms of what games tell us about the meaning of our bodies and minds.